Explore/agent app/Watts and Debts of Agentic Frameworks: An Empirical Study (Registered Report)
W

Aneetta Sara Shany, Chandrasekar S, Karthik Vaidhyanathan/Watts and Debts of Agentic Frameworks: An Empirical Study (Registered Report)Unknown

Context: Every agentic AI system shipped to production carries two hidden risks: accumulated Technical Debt (TD) and unmonitored runtime energy costs. While functional benchmarking is common, the empirical link between internal structural quality (specifically TD) and dynamic energy consumption during execution remains unexplored, creating a blind spot for practitioners and organizations managing sustainability and operational budgets at scale. Goal: We propose a confirmatory empirical study correlating Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) with hardware-level runtime energy consumption across agentic frameworks, to determine whether code quality can drive energy-aware design decisions. Method: We will evaluate five open-source agentic frameworks by executing a standardized task suite in a strictly controlled environment. SATD will be extracted via automated Python-based comment mining and categorized via LLM-based classification using fine-tuned prompt, while runtime energy will be measured at the hardware level. Our study will investigate three core research questions: (RQ1) the presence of TD within these frameworks; (RQ2) the variance in runtime energy consumption across architectures; and (RQ3) the statistical correlation between a framework's TD and its task-level energy consumption. Conclusion: The findings will establish whether automated source code analysis can serve as a reliable, early-warning proxy for energy-efficient framework selection, thereby advancing both green software engineering and agentic AI quality research.

agent app
GitHubCompare
Refreshed 16h ago
OverviewActivity52wAlternativesDocs
Stars0
Forks0
HF Downloads—30d
Last commit—
Refreshed16h ago
Project healthUnknownNo activity data.
Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.
Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.
AgentHub Score
48 / 100
Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →
Active project
48Score
Growth
40C
Activity
30C
Documentation
70C+
Maturity
45C
Community
42C
Production
58C
GitHub stars · 90 days0 +0.0%
30d90d1y
latest release
Commit activity · 52 weeksActive contributor activity
LowHigh
JunSepDecMarNow
Practical assessment
Should you use it?

✓ Best for

  • Research and experimentation
  • Prototype development
  • Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

  • Active community
  • Open source
  • Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

  • Untested at scale without validation
  • Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Review changelog before updating
  • Verify license for commercial use
Technical details
What's inside
Language—
License—
Sourcearxiv
Open source✗ No
Commercial use—
Docs—
Demo—

AgentHub Score

48
Score 48/100
Below average

Alternatives

C
crewai
26.1k · Multi-Agent
87
A
autogen
42.7k · Multi-Agent
71
S
smolagents
11.2k · Coding
84
O
openai-agents-python
9.4k · Multi-Agent
81
Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——
Indexed by AgentHub crawler16h ago
Monitor for new releasesongoing