PROTEAN: Beyond De Novo Generation - Can LLM Agents Perform Text-Guided Protein Structure Editing? — AI benchmark

Encheng Su, Xinping Liu, Yizhou Wang, Bozitao Zhong, Pengze Li, Jianyu Wu, Mingxiao Li, Xinzhu Ma, Aoran Wang, Liang Hong, Wanli Ouyang, Chen Tang, Houqiang Li, Shixiang Tang/PROTEAN: Beyond De Novo Generation - Can LLM Agents Perform Text-Guided Protein Structure Editing?Unknown

Generative AI has achieved remarkable success in de novo protein design, yet protein engineering typically begins with existing, characterized proteins. The primary demand is targeted local editing, e.g., engineering a specific region to optimize affinity, alter immunogenicity, or improve stability, while strictly preserving core catalytic motifs and overall scaffold integrity. However, no standardized framework currently exists for carrying out and evaluating such edits. In current generative-design workflows, researchers often need to manually specify complex low-level parameters and rely on repetitive, trial-and-error sampling and evaluation across generative backends to search for viable conformations. While large language models (LLMs) offer an intuitive interface to express these goals using natural language, prevailing structure-generation models cannot directly interpret high-level human instructions. To bridge this gap, we introduce PROTEAN, a standardized benchmark for text-guided protein structural editing. PROTEAN comprises 380 sub-tasks spanning six intervention families and evaluates a two-stage pipeline in which an LLM translates natural-language goals into backend-specific geometric constraints and a generative model remodels the protein backbone. A two-tier evaluation separates geometric compliance, including target attainment and off-target scope fidelity, from biophysical realizability assessed by inverse folding and refolding consistency. Across five frontier LLMs paired with three backends, strict end-to-end biophysical success starts at just 7.0%. Ablation studies show that LLM constraint compilation is already highly accurate, whereas the main bottlenecks are backend-specific scope leakage and refolding failure. PROTEAN provides an open testbed for developing autonomous, multi-backend macromolecular design agents.

benchmark

Stars0

Forks0

HF Downloads—30d

Last commit—

Refreshed9h ago

Project healthUnknownNo activity data.

Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.

Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.

AgentHub Score

55 / 100

Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →

Active project

55Score

Growth

40C

Activity

30C

Documentation

70C+

Maturity

45C

Community

42C

Production

58C

GitHub stars · 0 days observed0 not enough history

snapshots

not enough history

Repository activity · 0 days observednot enough history from pushed_at

inactivepushed

not enough history

Practical assessment

Should you use it?

✓ Best for

Research and experimentation
Prototype development
Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

Active community
Open source
Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

Untested at scale without validation
Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

Review changelog before updating
Verify license for commercial use

Technical details

What's inside

Language—

License—

Sourcearxiv

Open source✗ No

Commercial use—

Docs—

Demo—

PaperarXiv ↗

AgentHub Score

Score 55/100

Below average

Alternatives

RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systems

0 · benchmark

Commitment To Cooperation With Self-Negotiated Contracts

0 · benchmark

Exploring Structures in Physics Problems: Can AI Agents Discover Statistical Mechanical Mappings?

0 · benchmark

Coercion and Deception in AI-to-AI Management: An Agentic Benchmark of Unprompted Escalation

0 · benchmark

55 Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——

Indexed by AgentHub crawler9h ago

Monitor for new releasesongoing