Explore/agent app/MADP: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for Sustainable Document Processing with Human-in-the-Loop
M

Diego Gosmar, Giovanni Zenezini/MADP: A Multi-Agent Pipeline for Sustainable Document Processing with Human-in-the-LoopUnknown

Document processing automation remains a critical challenge in enterprise environments, where traditional manual approaches are labor-intensive and error-prone. We present MADP, a multi-agent architecture that addresses the challenge of automating document processing in enterprise settings by combining deep learning-based classification and parsing with large language model extraction, while maintaining accuracy through selective human validation. Our system integrates five specialized agents--Classificator, Splitter, Parser, Extraction, and Validator--with a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) mechanism and a novel Prompt Fine Tuning with Feedback Inheritance (PFTFI) approach. The operational analysis on a production use-case scenario of 100,000 invoices per year indicates a potential reduction of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) requirements by approximately 70%. Production deployment on 955 real-world documents processed through January 2026 achieves a 97.0% full-pipeline automation rate, with only 3% requiring non-AI fallback. Ablation evaluation on a stratified 100-document subset (5 documents per each of 20 supplier/document-type categories) demonstrates that the full MADP configuration with Human-in-the-Loop supervision attains 98.5% document-level accuracy. Additionally, we present a comprehensive sustainability analysis showing that our hybrid AI+HITL approach reduces CO2 emissions by 69%, energy consumption by 69%, and water usage by 63% compared to traditional manual processing. Benchmark comparisons of multiple LLM backends (Granite-Docling, Mistral-Small, DeepSeek-OCR) provide practical insights for deployment in production environments.

agent app
GitHubCompare
Refreshed 4d ago
OverviewActivity52wAlternativesDocs
Stars0
Forks0
HF Downloads—30d
Last commit—
Refreshed4d ago
Project healthUnknownNo activity data.
Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.
Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.
AgentHub Score
48 / 100
Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →
Active project
48Score
Growth
40C
Activity
30C
Documentation
70C+
Maturity
45C
Community
42C
Production
58C
GitHub stars · 90 days0 +0.0%
30d90d1y
latest release
Commit activity · 52 weeksActive contributor activity
LowHigh
JunSepDecMarNow
Practical assessment
Should you use it?

✓ Best for

  • Research and experimentation
  • Prototype development
  • Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

  • Active community
  • Open source
  • Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

  • Untested at scale without validation
  • Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Review changelog before updating
  • Verify license for commercial use
Technical details
What's inside
Language—
License—
Sourcearxiv
Open source✗ No
Commercial use—
Docs—
Demo—

AgentHub Score

48
Score 48/100
Below average

Alternatives

C
crewai
26.1k · Multi-Agent
87
A
autogen
42.7k · Multi-Agent
71
S
smolagents
11.2k · Coding
84
O
openai-agents-python
9.4k · Multi-Agent
81
Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——
Indexed by AgentHub crawler4d ago
Monitor for new releasesongoing