Explore/agent app/Energy-Aware Agentic Orchestration for Multi-Site Service Deployment
E

Rodrigo Moreira, Alisson Chaves, Larissa F. Rodrigues Moreira, Tereza Carvalho, Tiago Barros, Daniel Corujo, Rui Aguiar, David Gomez-Barquero, Flávio de Oliveira Silva/Energy-Aware Agentic Orchestration for Multi-Site Service DeploymentUnknown

Energy-aware orchestration across geographically distributed infrastructures is increasingly important as data centers absorb growing Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads. However, existing approaches often exclude the energy cost of automated decision-making from system-level sustainability assessments. This paper presents an energy-aware agentic orchestration framework that treats Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning as a measurable component of the control loop. We compare single-shot tool calling, ReAct, and plan-and-execute strategies on a multi-site Kubernetes testbed spanning two European data centers and instrumented at layers ranging from power distribution units to per-pod energy attribution. Using ten natural-language orchestration intents with varying decision complexity, we show that reasoning strategy and intent complexity strongly influence graphics processing unit (GPU) energy consumption during orchestration decisions. ReAct and plan-and-execute generated executable tool calls across all evaluated intents but required multiple LLM inferences, whereas the single-shot configuration was less costly but non-actionable. Prefix caching reduced mean ReAct GPU energy consumption by 29.4%. For the evaluated lightweight workload, the infrastructure-energy changes observed within the one-second measurement window were insufficient to offset the measured GPU decision energy. These findings demonstrate the importance of accounting for reasoning overhead when assessing the sustainability of AI-native orchestration and motivate energy-budgeted selection of agent strategies.

agent app
GitHubCompare
Refreshed 8h ago
OverviewActivity52wAlternativesDocs
Stars0
Forks0
HF Downloads—30d
Last commit—
Refreshed8h ago
Project healthUnknownNo activity data.
Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.
Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.
AgentHub Score
55 / 100
Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →
Active project
55Score
Growth
40C
Activity
30C
Documentation
70C+
Maturity
45C
Community
42C
Production
58C
GitHub stars · 0 days observed0 not enough history
snapshots
not enough history
Repository activity · 0 days observednot enough history from pushed_at
inactivepushed
not enough history
not enough history
Practical assessment
Should you use it?

✓ Best for

  • Research and experimentation
  • Prototype development
  • Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

  • Active community
  • Open source
  • Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

  • Untested at scale without validation
  • Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Review changelog before updating
  • Verify license for commercial use
Technical details
What's inside
Language—
License—
Sourcearxiv
Open source✗ No
Commercial use—
Docs—
Demo—

AgentHub Score

55
Score 55/100
Below average

Alternatives

C
ClinAgent: A ReAct-Based Agent for Conversational Access to Clinical Trial Information
0 · agent app
55
A
Agent2UCB: Agentic System for Generative Engine Optimization
0 · agent app
55
A
Agentic AI for Scientific Reasoning in Autonomous Quantum Sensing Experiments
0 · agent app
55
I
IDP AutoOpt: Agent-Driven Optimization of Document Processing Pipeline Configurations
0 · agent app
55Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——
Indexed by AgentHub crawler8h ago
Monitor for new releasesongoing