Explore/framework/DeepSAGE: Stage-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Structured CBT Counseling Dialogue
D

Qi Zhang, Heajun An, Prakriti Dumaru, Sang Won Lee, Lifu Huang, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Jin-Hee Cho/DeepSAGE: Stage-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Structured CBT Counseling DialogueUnknown

Large Language Model (LLM)-based counseling agents can generate fluent and supportive responses, but they often lack the structured, goal-directed progression required to conduct a coherent therapeutic session. We present DeepSAGE (Strategic AI Guidance Engine), a hybrid LLM--Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) framework for stage-aware counseling dialogue grounded in the first session of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). DeepSAGE represents the session as eleven stages with explicit therapeutic objectives, with an external controller determines stage completion and the DRL model selects therapeutic intentions that guide LLM response generation. We evaluate DeepSAGE against six retrieval-, prompting-, stage-, and policy-based alternatives. DeepSAGE elicits higher simulated client engagement and openness and achieves the strongest balance of stage-goal completion and dialogue efficiency among stage-structured systems. Domain expert review further indicates that the generated conversations exhibit broadly plausible emotional trajectories and recognizable CBT processes. Because the evaluation relies primarily on simulated clients and model-based metrics, these findings demonstrate comparative dialogue-control improvements rather than clinical effectiveness. These results suggest that combining stage-structured dialogue with learned strategy selection is a promising approach for AI counseling, though clinical effectiveness, safety, and real-world utility require further human evaluation.

framework
GitHubCompare
Refreshed 7h ago
OverviewActivity52wAlternativesDocs
Stars0
Forks0
HF Downloads—30d
Last commit—
Refreshed7h ago
Project healthUnknownNo activity data.
Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.
Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.
AgentHub Score
55 / 100
Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →
Active project
55Score
Growth
40C
Activity
30C
Documentation
70C+
Maturity
45C
Community
42C
Production
58C
GitHub stars · 5 days observed0 not enough history
snapshots
Repository activity · 5 days observedReal snapshots from pushed_at
inactivepushed
2026-08-262026-08-31
Practical assessment
Should you use it?

✓ Best for

  • Multi-agent orchestration
  • Production agentic workflows
  • Stateful long-running tasks

◎ Strengths

  • Stable API
  • Active release cadence
  • Strong GitHub community

✕ Not ideal for

  • Simple single-step automation
  • Teams without Python/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Breaking changes between minor versions
  • Ecosystem lock-in if tightly coupled
Technical details
What's inside
Language—
License—
Sourcearxiv
Open source✗ No
Commercial use—
Docs—
Demo—

AgentHub Score

55
Score 55/100
Below average

Alternatives

C
CHAL: Council of Hierarchical Agentic Language
0 · framework
55
S
Structuring agentic AI for HPC code modernization
0 · framework
55
A
Agentic Language-to-Objective Synthesis for Optofluidic Assembly
0 · framework
55
M
MindZero: Learning Online Mental Reasoning With Zero Annotations
0 · framework
55Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——
Indexed by AgentHub crawler7h ago
Monitor for new releasesongoing