A corrective agentic hybrid RAG and an operations-grounded evaluation for a scientific facility — AI benchmark

Rajat Sainju, Dariusz Jarosz, Hairong Shang, Michael Prince, Ryan M. Aydelott, Mathew J. Cherukara, Yine Sun, Michael D. Borland/A corrective agentic hybrid RAG and an operations-grounded evaluation for a scientific facilityUnknown

Scientific user facilities accumulate decades of operational knowledge that no single search index covers: electronic logbooks, technical documents, internal wikis, operations chat messages, maintenance records, and live control-system data. We present APS-RAG, Advanced Photon Source Retrieval Augmented Generation, a deployed platform that makes the institutional knowledge at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) accessible to staff through natural-language queries, along with an operations-grounded evaluation. The retrieval engine fuses dense, sparse, and knowledge-graph (KG) channels with query-type-adaptive reciprocal-rank fusion, adds a corrective agentic loop, and runs a native-tool ReAct executor over a Model Context Protocol (MCP) tooling layer. We construct APS-Bench, a 50-question, question-answering (QA) dataset with auditable gold answers. Every retrieval-augmented variant numerically improves strict vital-nugget recall over a naive BM25 baseline (63.8%), with the full corrective Agentic GraphRAG scoring (70.3%). The cross-encoder reranker contributes significantly to answer quality: removing it and allowing the LLM to score relevance drastically reduces strict vital recall by 32.8%. The graph channel and corrective loop contribute positively as expected, but the performance gains are marginal. Additionally, we also compare the performance of open-source and closed-source LLMs in final answer synthesis. We release the APS-Bench construction methodology, the six-layer evaluation harness, and the underlying codebase, along with the '/aps-rag' retrieval agent skill framework, to support reproduction and adoption at other facilities. Together, the deployed platform and its operations-grounded evaluation present a promising workflow for trustworthy, statistically grounded AI assistance in facility operations, transferable to other large scientific instruments.

benchmark

Stars0

Forks0

HF Downloads—30d

Last commit—

Refreshed26d ago

Project healthUnknownNo activity data.

Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.

Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.

AgentHub Score

55 / 100

Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →

Active project

55Score

Growth

40C

Activity

30C

Documentation

70C+

Maturity

45C

Community

42C

Production

58C

GitHub stars · 40 days observed0 not enough history

snapshots

Repository activity · 40 days observedReal snapshots from pushed_at

inactivepushed

2026-07-292026-09-08

Practical assessment

Should you use it?

✓ Best for

Research and experimentation
Prototype development
Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

Active community
Open source
Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

Untested at scale without validation
Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

Review changelog before updating
Verify license for commercial use

Technical details

What's inside

Language—

License—

Sourcearxiv

Open source✗ No

Commercial use—

Docs—

Demo—

PaperarXiv ↗

AgentHub Score

Score 55/100

Below average

Alternatives

RIFT-Bench: Dynamic Red-teaming For Agentic AI Systems

0 · benchmark

BAITBENCH: Measuring Agent Reward Hacking with Optional Shortcuts Planted in ML Tasks

0 · benchmark

TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents

0 · benchmark

Lies We Can See: Joint Verbal and Non-Verbal Deception by VLM Agents in Embodied Social Interactions

0 · benchmark

55 Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——

Indexed by AgentHub crawler26d ago

Monitor for new releasesongoing