Explore/agent app/Query-Centric Optimization of AI Workflows via Approximate Query Processing and Proxy Models
Q

Huayi Wang, Jun Xu, Gromit Yeuk-Yin Chan/Query-Centric Optimization of AI Workflows via Approximate Query Processing and Proxy ModelsUnknown

Many modern AI workflows, ranging from LLM post-training pipelines to agentic reasoning tasks, can be expressed as declarative queries whose expensive predicate is evaluated by a large model or reward function. We propose a query-centric formulation of these workflows and show that classical database techniques, namely approximate query processing (AQP) and proxy-model (PM) based filtering, can substantially reduce the number of expensive model invocations without requiring changes to the underlying models or pipelines. Our first strategy treats the workflow as an online aggregation problem: it progressively samples records, maintains a running aggregate estimate with a confidence interval, and terminates early once the interval stabilizes, accepting the estimate when it falls within a user-specified error bound. Our second strategy trains a lightweight, CPU-resident decision tree on a small set of oracle-labeled examples and uses it to pre-filter records whose outcome can be predicted with high confidence, routing only uncertain records to the expensive model. We evaluate both strategies on TPC-DS aggregate queries and on real LLM post-training pipelines including math reasoning, general instruction following, and code generation. On TPC-DS, Strategy AQP keeps aggregate error under 10% while reaching its adaptive stopping point at 10-15% of oracle calls under balanced distributions, an 85-90% reduction, and Strategy PM reduces oracle calls by 60-70%. On LLM pipelines, Strategy AQP reaches its adaptive stopping point at 20-50% of oracle calls with less than 5% accuracy loss on the structured math and code tasks; open-ended instruction following, scored by a reward model, shows a larger but bounded reduction. Strategy PM reduces reward-model scoring time by up to 19x on structured tasks with less than 10% accuracy loss.

agent app
GitHubCompare
Refreshed 4h ago
OverviewActivity52wAlternativesDocs
Stars0
Forks0
HF Downloads—30d
Last commit—
Refreshed4h ago
Project healthUnknownNo activity data.
Production readinessResearch / EarlyBest for exploration and prototyping.
Risk notesUnknown licenseVerify license before production use.
AgentHub Score
48 / 100
Composite score from 6 signals. How we score →
Active project
48Score
Growth
40C
Activity
30C
Documentation
70C+
Maturity
45C
Community
42C
Production
58C
GitHub stars · 90 days0 +0.0%
30d90d1y
latest release
Commit activity · 52 weeksActive contributor activity
LowHigh
JunSepDecMarNow
Practical assessment
Should you use it?

✓ Best for

  • Research and experimentation
  • Prototype development
  • Learning agentic patterns

◎ Strengths

  • Active community
  • Open source
  • Well-documented API

✕ Not ideal for

  • Untested at scale without validation
  • Teams without AI/ML expertise

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Review changelog before updating
  • Verify license for commercial use
Technical details
What's inside
Language—
License—
Sourcearxiv
Open source✗ No
Commercial use—
Docs—
Demo—

AgentHub Score

48
Score 48/100
Below average

Alternatives

C
crewai
26.1k · Multi-Agent
87
A
autogen
42.7k · Multi-Agent
71
S
smolagents
11.2k · Coding
84
O
openai-agents-python
9.4k · Multi-Agent
81
Compare all →

Recent activity

Latest commit ——
Indexed by AgentHub crawler4h ago
Monitor for new releasesongoing